Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/25/2016 in all areas

  1. CubeData is happy to announce we have finally finished our CentovaCast provisioning module which can be purchased for the usual $7/month or $100/one time note this release is special because we have finally revamped our licensing system on blesta and in this module we have used our new revamped blesta licensing system in it instead of the other billing panel & licensing system we was using and we are working on moving all modules back to this new revamped system order link for trial: https://cubedata.net/order/config/index/cart/?group_id=1&pricing_id=49 Order link for Owned License: https://cubedata.net/order/config/index/cart/?group_id=1&pricing_id=50 Order link for Monthly License: https://cubedata.net/order/config/index/cart/?group_id=1&pricing_id=50 Note if anyone asks we will not do any code audits on our modules! ^ New in V1.0.3+ it supports clientarea functions!
    2 points
  2. Yes, domain sync is necessary and would be handled by the plugin component.
    2 points
  3. Oooh, nice. If I had a spare $2k to blow, we'd be getting a Blesta happy face icon.
    2 points
  4. Michael

    Font Awesome 5!!!

    Done for you mate.
    1 point
  5. From the website, this looks to be exactly the license type they would need. But information is limited, I would agree as well, I'd contact to make sure.
    1 point
  6. I'm a bit confused too mate since it's open code minus 3 files: might be a Theme License maybe ask Dave mate.
    1 point
  7. Now that would be cool!
    1 point
  8. if you have already a free plan is ok, i have thought that the free plan will not exist in your new prices schema .
    1 point
  9. Yeah the import packages works on thesslstore so I assumed it would be fine lol.
    1 point
  10. we have wast about 10 hours with a module only with this issue !!! when i have test a core module i found the same error .
    1 point
  11. Huh looks like you are right mate LOL: http://screencast.com/t/1PAXWTCx
    1 point
  12. Think your missing the / on the end of the url mate.
    1 point
  13. They should only up the prices, not how many clients people have, but saying that more business for Blesta
    1 point
  14. You got a great point here. All license will be held directly w/o any third party access again as you mentioned to make more money I honestly didn't look at this way. To me this is wrong & shouldn't be this way.
    1 point
  15. yes I just added the screenshots in the opening post. I thank you for looking out for me Michael Dance which is why I removed that last line.
    1 point
  16. Iv PM you ready when your about Michael.
    1 point
  17. Lol, great avatar haha
    1 point
  18. I believe they want more money, they got rid of LicensePal, etc a few years back to get more money they claim its to support the customers direct, they have now got rid of the owned we take it to get more money, they'll be making resellers tiered and more like affiliates so that's to make more money lol.
    1 point
  19. I couldn't agree more here. The pricing plans are just fine & that is doable & acceptable, but when you start forcing clients to 'rent' a license then that becomes a problem. I won't speak for anyone but me I don't like rented. I feel this move here WHMCS has taken the wrong move here, but time will tell how hard its going to be. But just from the small discussion in this thread proves the point. But the question begs to be answered, why would WHMCS take such a move of removing 'owned' license from there line-up? It makes me feel they are following the foot steps of Kayako it used to be a very great helpdesk software solution; until they decided to take the route of removing there owned license from there line-up & then went a step further in having 'hosted solutions' only & forcing there clients to convert there 'owned' license to a 'hosted' solution monthly payment just to use kayako 5!
    1 point
  20. I was a bit confused on this, I was checking out his site & thought well nice ( Logo was blah ); then I went to check out his blesta all integrated. Well that wasn't the case I seen WHMCS, I am thinking why didn't he just post that over at WHMCS forums? I am not bashing WHMCS it just would have made more sense posting over at WHMCS wouldn't you think?
    1 point
  21. That is very nice, very clean & everything seems to flow very good. Good Job!
    1 point
  22. count me in - we're leaving WHMCS - like a - for good. The main reason is the inability to buy further "owned" licenses and loss of trust in WHMCS company in general. I dont have issues with levels of new prices, I just REFUSE to have a key company software - a billing - "just rented". I need a "boxed" version just for my peace of mind.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...